ANTI-AVOIDANCE MEASURES OF GENERAL NATURE AND SCOPE-GAAR AND OTHER RULES

Paper by: Guillermo O. Teijeiro

 Most countries have either judicial or statutory general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR); Argentina enrols in the second group as GAAR are of statutory nature. Countries in both groups frequently combine GAAR with special anti-avoidance rules (SAAR). 

GAAR are generally applied to interpret tax rules, to characterize taxpayers acts and transactions (i.e., assessment of facts), or both, as it is the case in Argentina. 

SAAR may be patterned after GAAR to emphasize their application in certain contexts, or may be specifically designed as mostly mechanical rules separate from the conceptual elements of GAAR. In both cases, the interaction between GAAR and SAAR is complex and frequently raises conflicts of application and overlap. The conflicts focus on whether SAAR exhaustively govern the tax avoidance issue in their context of application to the exclusion of other rules or whether GAAR also apply in that context as a residual rule. Similar conflicts arise between domestic GAAR and treaty GAAR. Both are still open issues under Argentine tax law

Related Articles

Understanding Double Tax Treaties: A Comprehensive Guide

*For clarity, the term Double Tax TreatyA Double Taxation Agreement (DTA), also known as a Double Taxation Treaty (or a Tax Treaty), is an international

Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The High Court of Delhi, in its judgment dated 14 October 2024, upheld the Tribunal’s decision to reinstate the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate transfer pricing method for SABIC India Pvt Ltd. The Revenue, represented by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -7, challenged the Tribunal’s ruling, which annulled the adjustment of ₹3,61,32,20,620/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) using the residual “other method” under Rule 10B(1)(f) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.