Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: CASE SUMMARY

Case Information

  • Court: High Court of Delhi
  • Case No.: ITA 514/2024
  • Applicant: The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7
  • Defendant: SABIC India Pvt Ltd
  • Judgment Date: 14 October 2024
  • Download the FULL JUDGMENT

Judgment Summary

The High Court of Delhi, in its judgment dated 14 October 2024, upheld the Tribunal’s decision to reinstate the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate transfer pricing method for SABIC India Pvt Ltd. The Revenue, represented by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -7, challenged the Tribunal’s ruling, which annulled the adjustment of ₹3,61,32,20,620/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) using the residual “other method” under Rule 10B(1)(f) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

The dispute arose over benchmarking the marketing support services provided by SABIC India to its Associated Enterprises (AEs). SABIC India, a wholly-owned subsidiary of foreign entities, facilitates the sale of fertilizers, chemicals, and polymers across India and neighbouring countries. For the financial year 2015-16 (assessment year 2016-17), SABIC India applied the TNMM to benchmark its transactions, consistent with prior years from AY 2009-10 to AY 2014-15. However, the TPO rejected TNMM, claiming it was inapplicable due to the company’s functional profile as a commission agent and instead opted for the “other method.”

The Tribunal overturned this adjustment on two grounds:

  1. Inadequate Justification: The TPO failed to provide reasons for rejecting TNMM, a method consistently applied and accepted in prior years.
  2. Comparables Flawed: The comparables selected by the TPO under the “other method” were deemed inconsistent and irrelevant, including agreements unrelated to SABIC India’s business model.

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal’s position, emphasizing that a departure from previously accepted methodologies requires substantial reasoning. Additionally, the Court criticised the TPO for failing to adhere to the OECD and ICAI guidelines, which require exhaustive justification for rejecting all five standard methods before resorting to the residual “other method.”

In conclusion, the Court ruled in favour of SABIC India Pvt Ltd, reiterating the primacy of TNMM in benchmarking similar marketing support services and underlining the importance of consistency, transparency, and proper documentation in transfer pricing assessments. This decision serves as a landmark ruling for multinationals and tax authorities navigating complex transfer pricing disputes.

VIEW THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (WEB)

File Type: pdf
File Size: 220 KB
Countries: India
Tags: ALP, Arms Length Principle, International Tax, Tax Compliance, TNMM, Transactional Net Margin Method, Transfer Pricing