France vs SAS Roger Vivier: CASE SUMMARY

Case Information

  • Court: Cour Administrative d’Appel de Paris, 9th Chamber
  • Case Number: 23PA01130
  • Applicant: SAS Roger Vivier Paris
  • Defendant: French Ministry for the Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty
  • Judgment Date: 13 December 2024
  • Download the FULL JUDGMENT

Judgment Summary

The Cour Administrative d’Appel de Paris upheld significant portions of the tax adjustments imposed on SAS Roger Vivier Paris (RVP) for the years 2012–2014. The French tax authorities argued that RVP, as part of a group involving foreign parent entities and related companies, engaged in practices leading to profit transfers inconsistent with the arm’s length principle as outlined in Article 57 of the French General Tax Code. The adjustments addressed insufficient re-invoicing for brand promotion expenses, failure to apply appropriate margins, and substantial discounts on unsold inventory returned to its supplier, Tod’s.

The tax authorities applied the transactional net margin method (TNMM), referencing 43 comparable independent companies operating in the luxury distribution sector, and determined that RVP’s profit margins were significantly below arm’s length benchmarks. The authorities rejected RVP’s arguments that its practices, such as a 65% discount on unsold goods and limited re-invoicing for promotional costs, reflected industry norms or market conditions. RVP’s reliance on alternative tax provisions and interpretations from the French tax code was also dismissed.

Key findings included:

  • The existence of indirect transfers of profits through pricing and operational decisions.
  • Dependence relationships among RVP and its related entities in Portugal, Luxembourg, and Italy.
  • Use of flawed methodologies by RVP, as no comparable data or adjustments were presented to counter the tax authorities’ analysis.

Penalties of 40% were upheld for deliberate non-compliance, with the court noting that RVP’s lack of transfer pricing documentation and repeated underreporting indicated intentional tax evasion.

The court also addressed procedural objections raised by RVP, including the handling of tax loss carryforwards and the choice of comparables, concluding that the authorities acted within the scope of the law.

This judgment has far-reaching implications for multinationals operating in France, particularly those in the luxury sector. It reinforces the importance of comprehensive transfer pricing documentation, adherence to the arm’s length principle, and proactive engagement in risk management processes.

VIEW THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (WEB)

File Type: pdf
File Size: 224 KB
Countries: France
Tags: ALP, Arms Length Principle, International Tax, Tax Compliance, TNMM, Transactional Net Margin Method, Transfer Pricing