India vs AON Consulting: JUDGMENT

Case Information

  • Court: High Court of Delhi
  • Case No: ITA 244/2024
  • Applicant: AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (Successor Entity of AON Services (I) Pvt. Ltd.)
  • Defendant: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 and Ors.
  • Judgment Date: 06 February 2025

The High Court of Delhi, in its ruling on AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 and Ors. (ITA 244/2024), addressed a crucial transfer pricing (TP) dispute concerning the application of Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) to transactions not covered under the agreement. The judgment clarifies that MAP-based TP adjustments, which are negotiated between competent authorities of contracting states, cannot be unilaterally extended to transactions beyond their scope.

The case originated from a TP adjustment made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) in respect of international transactions of Hewitt Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd., later merged into AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. The TPO had initially made an upward TP adjustment of ₹44,06,38,092, consisting of:

  1. ₹41,79,89,294 for US Transactions, which were settled through the MAP process under Article 27 of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
  2. ₹2,26,48,798 for Non-US Transactions, which remained disputed.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), while hearing the case, ruled in favour of the Revenue and remanded the Non-US Transactions to the TPO, directing that the same framework agreed upon under MAP for US Transactions be applied to Non-US Transactions as well.

VIEW THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (WEB)

DOWNLOAD THE FULL SUMMARY PDF HERE

File Type: pdf
File Size: 613 KB
Countries: India
Tags: ALP, Arms Length Principle, MAP, Mutual Agreement Procedure, TNMM, Transactional Net Margin Method, Transfer Pricing