Orde van Vlaamse Balies vs Belgium: JUDGMENT

Case Information

  • Court: Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber)
  • Case No: C-694/20
  • Applicant: Orde van Vlaamse Balies, IG, Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers, CD, JU
  • Defendant: Vlaamse Regering (Flemish Government, Belgium)
  • Judgment Date: 8 December 2022

In Case C-694/20, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) examined the legality of certain reporting obligations imposed on lawyers under Council Directive 2011/16/EU (as amended by Directive 2018/822). This directive, commonly referred to as DAC6, requires intermediaries involved in potentially aggressive cross-border tax arrangements to report these transactions to the relevant tax authorities within 30 days. However, a critical issue arises with intermediaries who are lawyers, as they are bound by legal professional privilege. DAC6 provides an exemption allowing lawyer-intermediaries to abstain from reporting arrangements if doing so would infringe upon this privilege. The directive further mandates that these lawyer-intermediaries notify other involved intermediaries of their reporting obligations. This requirement to notify other intermediaries was contested in the Belgian Constitutional Court by the Flemish Bar Association and several tax lawyers, who argued that it infringed on the right to private life (Article 7) and the right to a fair trial (Article 47) under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Charter).

VIEW THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (WEB)

DOWNLOAD THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (PDF)

File Type: pdf
File Size: 270 KB
Countries: Belgium, European Union
Tags: Client Attorney Privilege, Cross Border Taxation, Legal Privilege, Privacy, Tax Compliance, Tax Law, Tax Risk, Tax Risk Management, Tax Transparency