UK vs Glencore Energy CASE SUMMARY

Case Information

  • Court: Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
  • Case No: C1/2017/1845
  • Applicant: Glencore Energy UK Limited
  • Defendant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
  • Judgment Date: 2 November 2017
  • Download the FULL JUDGMENT

Judgment Summary

This case examines the boundaries of judicial review in tax disputes involving the Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), a tax introduced by the Finance Act 2015 to prevent profit shifting by multinationals. Glencore Energy UK Limited (GENUK), a subsidiary of the Swiss-based Glencore International AG (GIAG), was assessed under the DPT framework after HMRC deemed the service fees paid by GENUK to GIAG under a Risk and Services Agreement (RSA) to be excessive. The arrangement allegedly diverted profits from the UK to Switzerland, reducing GENUK’s tax liability.

HMRC issued a Charging Notice for £21.3 million based on its assessment of taxable diverted profits. GENUK challenged the notice, claiming procedural errors in the evaluation process and asserting that the RSA complied with the arm’s length principle. The High Court rejected GENUK’s application for judicial review, stating that statutory remedies, including the review process and subsequent appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), were adequate. GENUK appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s ruling. It emphasised that judicial review should not be used to bypass statutory mechanisms designed to resolve tax disputes. The judgment reiterated that GENUK’s objections, such as those regarding the economic substance test and calculation methods, were better addressed through the statutory review and appeal process. The court underscored Parliament’s intention for the DPT framework to include robust safeguards via these statutory remedies.

This case is significant as it clarifies the limited role of judicial review in tax matters, particularly where specific statutory remedies exist. It also highlights the complexities of assessing intercompany arrangements under the DPT and reinforces the need for multinationals to ensure robust compliance with transfer pricing principles.

VIEW THE FULL CASE SUMMARY (WEB)

File Type: pdf
File Size: 208 KB
Countries: United Kingdom
Tags: Arms Length Principle, Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method, Diverted Profits Tax, Economic Substance, Profit Shifting, Tax Compliance, Tax Risk Management, Thin Cappitalisation, Transactional Net Margin Method, Transfer Pricing