Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Bona Fide Error

A Bona Fide Error is an unintentional mistake made in good faith that occurs despite implementing reasonable precautions. In the context of tax law, finance, or accounting, it often applies to instances where a taxpayer, accountant, or financial institution makes an inadvertent error in calculation, reporting, or compliance without any deliberate intention of circumventing regulations. Bona Fide Errors can range from miscalculations and administrative oversights to misunderstandings of complex tax laws or accounting standards.

The distinction between a Bona Fide Error and intentional wrongdoing is crucial because it impacts the legal and regulatory consequences a party may face. Tax authorities or regulatory bodies often examine the measures and internal controls an individual or organization has in place to prevent such errors. If reasonable precautions were taken, penalties may be mitigated or waived entirely.

Characteristics of a Bona Fide Error

  • Inadvertent Mistake: The error is accidental, with no malicious intent or effort to mislead.
  • Reasonable Precautions: The person or entity took all appropriate steps to ensure accuracy or compliance.
  • Corrective Actions: The error is promptly corrected upon discovery, and any necessary disclosures are made.

Examples of Bona Fide Errors in Practice

Example 1: Tax Filing Miscalculation

Imagine a multinational corporation filing its annual tax return. The company’s tax department uses advanced software to ensure compliance with local tax laws. However, due to an unexpected software glitch, taxable income is significantly underestimated, leading to an underpayment of taxes. The error is later identified during an internal audit. Since the company can demonstrate that it exercised reasonable care by using reliable software and had no intent to defraud, the tax authority may classify this as a bona fide error and reduce any penalties.

Example 2: Incorrect VAT Application

A European retail company misapplies Value Added Tax (VAT) rates to certain cross-border transactions. The finance team believed the products were zero-rated based on an outdated interpretation of VAT rules. Once the error is flagged, the company self-reports the discrepancy to the relevant tax authority and adjusts its tax returns accordingly. Here, the company shows it acted in good faith, as it had based its VAT application on what it genuinely believed to be correct. If proven to be a Bona Fide Error, penalties may be lessened, especially if prompt corrective measures were taken.

Example 3: Misclassification of Employee Expenses

A consulting firm reimburses its employees for various business expenses, believing these to be tax-deductible under prevailing tax laws. However, a subsequent government audit revealed that some costs were incorrectly classified. The firm had relied on expert tax advice and documented its rationale. The authorities may accept this as a Bona Fide Error if the firm demonstrates sufficient grounds to classify the expenses as it did and acted without any intent of tax evasion.

Cases and Judgments Involving Bona Fide Error

Several court cases have examined the concept of Bona Fide Error, particularly in the tax and financial sectors. One notable case is United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241 (1985), where the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that relying on an agent, such as a tax professional, to file tax returns does not necessarily constitute a Bona Fide Error if the error was easily preventable. This case underscored the importance of due diligence, highlighting that good-faith mistakes could still attract penalties if adequate precautions were not taken.

In the UK, the case of Whiteside v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 355 (TC) involved a taxpayer who made an error in a tax return despite following professional advice. The tribunal acknowledged that the mistake was not deliberate and considered the taxpayer’s intentions and efforts to comply, leading to a reduced penalty.