Australia vs Oracle: JUDGMENT
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Australia vs Oracle
Australia vs Oracle: JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Australia vs Oracle
Australia vs Oracle: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
This case addressed Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd’s application to temporarily stay domestic court proceedings while a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under the Australia-Ireland double taxation treaty was ongoing. The case revolved around whether payments made by Oracle Australia to Oracle Ireland for sublicensing software were “royalties” under the treaty and thus subject to Australian withholding tax obligations.
Australia vs Oracle: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Australia vs Singtel
Australia vs Singtel: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The High Court of Australia deliberated on a significant transfer pricing case between Singapore Telecom Australia Investments Pty Ltd (STAI) and the Commissioner of Taxation, centering on whether a parental guarantee should be implied in assessing the arm’s length nature of intercompany loans.
Australia vs Singtel: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The High Court of Delhi, in its judgment dated 14 October 2024, upheld the Tribunal’s decision to reinstate the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate transfer pricing method for SABIC India Pvt Ltd. The Revenue, represented by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -7, challenged the Tribunal’s ruling, which annulled the adjustment of ₹3,61,32,20,620/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) using the residual “other method” under Rule 10B(1)(f) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd
Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The Italy v. Ilapark SPA case brings forward critical issues in transfer pricing, specifically the appropriateness of the selected transfer pricing method for a business entity under Italy’s tax framework and its alignment with OECD guidelines.
Italy vs Ilapark: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Italy vs Ilapak
Italy vs Ilapark: JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: X BV v Netherlands
X BV v Netherlands (Staatssecretaris van Financiën): JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Slovakia vs Minebea Access Solutions
Slovakia vs Minebea Access Solutions: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The Minebea Slovakia transfer pricing case highlights the intricate challenges of aligning intra-group transactions with arm’s length principles. In this landmark ruling, the Supreme Administrative Court of Slovakia dismissed a cassation complaint filed by Minebea Access Solutions Slovakia s.r.o., a subsidiary of the Valeo Group.
Slovakia vs Minebea Access Solutions: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The case concerns a tax dispute between A…, S.A., a Portuguese mining company, and AT – Tax and Customs Authority. At the heart of the issue was the sale of an industrial wash plant by A… to B…, S.A., at a symbolic price of €1. AT contended that the sale breached transfer pricing principles under Article 58 of the IRC Code.
Portugal vs A Mining SA: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »