SARS starts to target buyers of luxury goods
Article originally published by NEWS24 The SA Revenue Service (SARS) is investigating luxury-goods purchases as part of a clampdown on […]
SARS starts to target buyers of luxury goods Read Post »
Article originally published by NEWS24 The SA Revenue Service (SARS) is investigating luxury-goods purchases as part of a clampdown on […]
SARS starts to target buyers of luxury goods Read Post »
This article was published by South African Revenue Service and the full article is available at: https://www.sars.gov.za/individuals/what-if-i-do-not-agree/being-audited-or-selected-for-verification/ What is verification?
SARS – Being Audited or Selected for Verification Read Post »
Article by: Regan van Rooy Movie buffs will hopefully get the joke intended in this week’s newsletter title, however, if
Risky Business – 10 things I hate about TP! Read Post »
The Academy of Tax Law would like to congratulate the head of our academics, Dr Daniel N. Erasmus, and his
Another TP tax dispute argued before the Tax Board in Tanzania won for our client Read Post »
Eaton Corporation, a global manufacturer of electrical and industrial products, faced significant tax disputes with the IRS regarding its transfer pricing practices. The disputes centered around the company’s Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) with the IRS, which were intended to establish transfer pricing methodologies for transactions between Eaton and its subsidiaries. The APAs were canceled by the IRS, leading to a tax court case in 2017 and an appeal in 2022.
Eaton Corporation vs. IRS: Transfer Pricing Dispute Read Post »
The case of Medtronic, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue revolves around the complex issue of transfer pricing, particularly concerning the appropriate method to determine the arm’s length royalty rates for the use of intellectual property between Medtronic US and its Puerto Rican subsidiary, MPROC.
Medtronic vs Commissioner of Inland Revenue Read Post »
The Ferragamo France transfer pricing case offers valuable insights for luxury goods companies. This landmark ruling highlights the complexities of transfer pricing in the high-end retail sector.
Ferragamo France Transfer Pricing Case: Key Lessons for Luxury Brands Read Post »
The case of UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax revolves around the interpretation of whether the applicant had a “Business Connection” in India and a “Permanent Establishment” (P.E.) under the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favour of UPS Asia Group, stating that when the Indian Associated Enterprise (A.E.) is remunerated at arm’s length price, no further profit attribution is required, making the existence of a P.E. tax-neutral.
Glencore Australia (CMPL) sold copper concentrate produced in Australia to its Swiss parent, Glencore International AG (GIAG).
The tax authorities found that the price paid by Glencore International AG to Glencore Australia for the copper concentrate in the relevant years, according to a price-sharing agreement, was less than the price that might reasonably be expected to have been paid in an arm’s length dealing between independent parties.
Transfer Pricing Dispute Between Australia and Glencore Investment Pty Ltd Read Post »
In Lexel AB v Skatteverket (Case C‑484/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Swedish tax legislation, which denied Lexel AB the right to deduct interest payments made to a group company located in another EU Member State (France), infringed upon the freedom of establishment protected under Article 49 TFEU.
The Coca-Cola transfer pricing dispute is a landmark case between The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The case centers on the appropriate transfer pricing method to allocate profits between Coca-Cola’s U.S. parent company and its foreign subsidiaries. The IRS argued that Coca-Cola’s existing transfer pricing method resulted in underpayment of U.S. taxes, leading to a significant tax deficiency.
Coca-Cola vs. IRS: Landmark Transfer Pricing Dispute Read Post »
The Federal Court of Appeal’s ruling in the case between Her Majesty The Queen and Cameco Corporation centers on the application of Canada’s transfer pricing rules, particularly under Section 247 of the Income Tax Act.
Canada (Her Majesty the Queen) v. Cameco Corporation Read Post »