India vs AON Consulting: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

Case Information:

Court: High Court of Delhi
Case No: ITA 244/2024
Applicant: AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (Successor Entity of AON Services (I) Pvt. Ltd.)
Defendant: Principal Commissioner of Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More – 1 and Ors.
Judgment Date: 06 February 2025

Judgment Summary

The High Court of Delhi, in its ruling on AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More – 1 and Ors. (ITA 244/2024), addressed a crucial transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More dispute concerning the application of Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) to transactions not covered under the agreement. The judgment clarifies that MAP-based TP adjustments, which are negotiated between competent authorities of contracting states, cannot be unilaterally extended to transactions beyond their scope.

The case originated from a TP adjustment made by the Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Officer (TPO) in respect of international transactions of Hewitt Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd., later merged into AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. The TPO had initially made an upward TP adjustment of ₹44,06,38,092, consisting of:

₹41,79,89,294 for US Transactions, which were settled through the MAP process under Article 27 of the India-US Double TaxationDouble Taxation occurs when the same income or financial transaction is taxed twice, typically in different jurisdictions. It can arise in two primary contexts: economic double taxation, where the same income is taxed twice in the hands of different taxpayers, and juridical double taxation, where the same taxpayer is taxed on the same income in more than one country. Double... More Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
₹2,26,48,798 for Non-US Transactions, which remained disputed.

The Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Appellate Tribunal , while hearing the case, ruled in favour of the Revenue and remanded the Non-US Transactions to the TPO, directing that the same framework agreed upon under MAP for US Transactions be applied to Non-US Transactions as well.

AON Consulting challenged this order before the High Court of Delhi, arguing that MAP is a consensual dispute resolution mechanism between two contracting states, and its principles cannot be imposed unilaterally on transactions outside its purview. The core issue was whether the TP framework settled between the US and Indian tax authorities under MAP could be extended to unrelated Non-US Transactions.

The High Court ruled in favour of AON Consulting, holding that:

MAP settlements are voluntary, case-specific, and dependent on negotiations between competent authorities.
The ITAT’s decision to extend MAP principles to Non-US Transactions was legally flawed as there was no agreement with other jurisdictions for such an application.
Transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More must be determined independently under Section 92C of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961, and Rule 10B of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Rules, 1962.

The court emphasised that MAP settlements cannot be used as a binding precedent for unrelated transactions, especially when there is no bilateral agreement with the tax authorities of the respective Non-US jurisdictions. The Revenue’s approach, which sought to impose a negotiated MAP outcome onto transactions outside its jurisdiction, was rejected.

As a result, the High Court overturned the ITAT’s order and restored AON Consulting’s appeal, directing the ITAT to assess the TP adjustments independently, without relying on the MAP framework used for US Transactions.

Key Points of the Judgment

1. Background

AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewitt Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd.) is a wholly owned subsidiary of AON PLC, an Ireland-based multinational engaged in human resources consulting, payroll processing, business process outsourcing, and software development services. During Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09, the company engaged in international transactions with its Associated Enterprises (AEs), leading to a transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More (TP) dispute with Indian tax authorities.

The Assessee declared total income of ₹9,46,63,523 in its return for AY 2008-09. Since the volume of international transactions exceeded the prescribed threshold, the case was referred to the TPO under Section 92CA of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961. The TPO subsequently determined an upward TP adjustment of ₹44,06,38,092, of which:

₹41,79,89,294 related to transactions with AEs in the US. These transactions were later resolved under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) between the competent authorities of the US and India under Article 27 of the Indo-US DTAA.
₹2,26,48,798 related to Non-US Transactions, which remained contested and were not covered by MAP.

The Assessee had applied the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More as the most appropriate TP method. However, the TPO rejected the Assessee’s economic analysis, selected different comparables, and determined a higher profit level indicatorA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More (PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More), leading to the TP adjustment.

The Assessee challenged the TP adjustment before the ITAT. The ITAT, while considering the case, remanded the matter to the TPO, directing that the MAP-based framework used for US Transactions also be applied to Non-US Transactions. AON Consulting appealed this order before the High Court of Delhi, arguing that MAP agreements are negotiated and specific, and cannot be unilaterally extended to transactions outside their scope.

2. Core Dispute

The primary dispute in this case revolved around the applicability of the MAP settlement framework to Non-US Transactions, which were not covered under the MAP process.

AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. engaged in international transactions with both US-based and Non-US-based Associated Enterprises (AEs). The Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Officer had determined a total upward transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More adjustment of ₹44,06,38,092, of which:

₹41,79,89,294 related to transactions with AEs in the United States. These transactions were resolved under the MAP process between the competent authorities of the US and India, as per Article 27 of the Indo-US Double TaxationDouble Taxation occurs when the same income or financial transaction is taxed twice, typically in different jurisdictions. It can arise in two primary contexts: economic double taxation, where the same income is taxed twice in the hands of different taxpayers, and juridical double taxation, where the same taxpayer is taxed on the same income in more than one country. Double... More Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
₹2,26,48,798 related to Non-US Transactions, which remained disputed and outside the scope of the MAP resolution.

The ITAT, while hearing the appeal, directed the TPO to apply the same MAP framework agreed for US Transactions to the Non-US Transactions, arguing that this would ensure uniformity in transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More assessments.

AON Consulting challenged this decision, arguing that:

The MAP process is a consensual dispute resolution mechanism that applies only to the contracting states involved in the agreement.
No similar agreement existed for Non-US Transactions, making the application of MAP inappropriate.
Transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More must be determined independently under domestic tax lawTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More and OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines.
The ITAT’s approach was legally flawed, as it overrode the established transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More assessment process under Section 92C of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961, and Rule 10B of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Rules, 1962.

The core legal issue before the High Court was whether a MAP-based settlement, negotiated between two specific jurisdictions (India and the US), could be extended unilaterally to transactions with entities from other jurisdictions.

3. Court Findings

The High Court of Delhi ruled in favour of AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd., holding that the ITAT erred in directing the TPO to apply the MAP-based framework to Non-US Transactions. The court found that MAP settlements are jurisdiction-specific and cannot be extended unilaterally to transactions involving other countries.

Key Findings

MAP Agreements Are Bilateral and Cannot Be Extended Unilaterally
- The MAP under Article 27 of the Indo-US DTAA is a negotiated dispute resolution mechanism between the competent authorities of two contracting states.
- The High Court emphasized that MAP outcomes are based on a mutual consensus between tax authorities and are not legally binding on transactions involving third-party jurisdictions.
- Non-US Transactions were not covered under MAP, making the ITAT’s direction to apply the same framework legally unsound.
Transfer Pricing AdjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More Must Be Made Under Domestic Law
- Transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More for Non-US Transactions must be determined independently in accordance with:
  - Section 92C of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961
  - Rule 10B of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Rules, 1962
- Applying MAP principles beyond their negotiated scope would bypass statutory TP assessment procedures.
ITAT’s Direction Was Beyond Its Jurisdiction
- The court held that ITAT acted beyond its jurisdiction by imposing a consensual MAP resolution onto transactions that had not been negotiated under the procedure.
- A taxpayer’s acceptance of a MAP resolution in one jurisdiction does not waive its right to contest TP adjustments in unrelated transactions.

4. Outcome

The High Court of Delhi ruled in favour of AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd., overturning the ITAT’s decision to apply the MAP framework to Non-US Transactions. The court restored the Assessee’s appeal and directed the ITAT to reassess the TP adjustments independently under the applicable domestic laws.

Key Aspects of the Judgment Outcome

ITAT’s Direction Was Legally Unsustainable
- The High Court held that ITAT erred in directing the Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Officer to apply the MAP-based framework to transactions not covered under the MAP settlement.
- MAP resolutions are specific to the jurisdictions involved (India and the US in this case) and cannot be automatically extended to Non-US Transactions.
Transfer Pricing AdjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More Must Follow Statutory Provisions
- The court reaffirmed that transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More must be determined in accordance with Section 92C of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961, and Rule 10B of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Rules, 1962.
- The MAP agreement applied only to the TP adjustments for US Transactions, and Non-US Transactions required a separate, independent TP assessment.
Assessee’s Rights Were Upheld
- The court rejected the Revenue’s contention that applying the MAP framework to Non-US Transactions was justified for uniformity.
- It emphasized that AON Consulting was entitled to contest TP adjustments for Non-US Transactions without being bound by the MAP resolution for US Transactions.

Final Decision

The ITAT’s decision was overturned, and the case was remanded back for reassessment.
The High Court clarified that MAP resolutions must remain jurisdiction-specific and cannot be unilaterally applied to unrelated TP disputes.
This judgment sets a significant precedent for taxpayers challenging unilateral application of MAP principles in TP cases.

Transfer Pricing Method Used

The TNMMThe Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More was adopted as the most appropriate transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More method by both the Assessee and the Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Officer (TPO) in this case.

Application of TNMMThe Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More by the Assessee

AON Consulting applied TNMMThe Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More to determine the arm’s length price for its international transactions.
It selected comparable companies based on specific filters and calculated the Profit Level IndicatorA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More (PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More) as Operating Profit to Total Cost (OP/TC).
The average PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More of comparable companies selected by the Assessee was 13.06%, while its own PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More stood at 15.69%, demonstrating that the transactions were at arm’s length.

Rejection of Assessee’s Comparability AnalysisA Comparability Analysis is an essential framework in Transfer Pricing used to evaluate whether the conditions of a transaction between related entities (such as subsidiaries of the same multinational enterprise) are consistent with the arm’s length principle. The arm’s length principle requires that intercompany transactions reflect terms that independent entities would negotiate under comparable circumstances, ensuring that multinational corporations (MNEs)... More by the TPO

The TPO rejected the Assessee’s analysis, claiming that the selection of comparable companies was flawed.
The TPO applied different comparability filters and removed certain low-margin entities, leading to an inflated PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More benchmarkBenchmarking, within the context of transfer pricing, refers to the process of analysing and comparing financial and economic data from independent companies to establish a fair and arm’s length price for controlled transactions. It is typically conducted using databases that provide details about comparable companies and transactions. The objective is to determine whether the terms and conditions of intercompany transactions... More.
New comparable companies selected by the TPO resulted in a higher mean PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More of 26.2% for software development services and 29.16% for IT-enabled services.
Consequently, an upward TP adjustment of ₹44,06,38,092 was made, with ₹2,26,48,798 attributed to Non-US Transactions.

High Court’s View on the TP Methodology

The High Court did not dispute the use of TNMMThe Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More as the most appropriate methodThe Most Appropriate Method (MAM) is a key concept in transfer pricing that determines the best method to evaluate whether intra-group transactions adhere to the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP). The ALP ensures that transactions between related parties are priced as they would be between independent parties under comparable conditions. The selection of the MAM depends on several factors, including the... More but criticised the ITAT for directing the TPO to apply MAP-based adjustments to Non-US Transactions.
The court emphasized that the TP adjustment for Non-US Transactions must be determined independently under the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961 and OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines, without reference to the MAP framework agreed for US Transactions.

Major Issues or Areas of Contention

This case raised several significant legal and procedural issues in the context of transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More and the application of the MAP.

1. Whether MAP Settlements Can Be Unilaterally Applied to Non-US Transactions

The core dispute in this case was whether the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Appellate Tribunal erred in directing the TPO to apply the MAP-based framework for US Transactions to Non-US Transactions.
The Assessee argued that MAP agreements are bilateral, voluntary, and jurisdiction-specific, negotiated between two contracting states (India and the US in this case).
The High Court ruled in favour of AON Consulting, stating that MAP cannot be extended beyond its negotiated scope.

2. Rejection of Assessee’s Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Analysis

The Assessee had applied the TNMMThe Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is one of the five primary transfer pricing methods recognised under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. TNMM is applied to evaluate whether the conditions of a controlled transaction between associated enterprises are at arm’s length. Unlike traditional transaction methods, which directly compare prices or gross margins, TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to... More and selected comparables that resulted in a mean PLIA Profit Level Indicator (PLI) is a financial metric used in transfer pricing to evaluate and compare the relative profitability of related-party transactions. PLIs serve as a critical tool in determining whether intercompany transactions comply with the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP), which mandates that transactions between related entities should be conducted as if they were independent parties operating in open... More of 13.06%.
The TPO rejected the Assessee’s comparability analysisA Comparability Analysis is an essential framework in Transfer Pricing used to evaluate whether the conditions of a transaction between related entities (such as subsidiaries of the same multinational enterprise) are consistent with the arm’s length principle. The arm’s length principle requires that intercompany transactions reflect terms that independent entities would negotiate under comparable circumstances, ensuring that multinational corporations (MNEs)... More, selecting high-margin comparables, which inflated the ALP and resulted in a higher TP adjustment.
The court found that the ITAT should have assessed the correctness of the TPO’s adjustments independently instead of applying MAP principles to unrelated transactions.

3. Legal Basis for Transfer Pricing AdjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More

The Revenue’s approach implied that MAP resolutions could override the statutory provisions of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Act, 1961, and Rule 10B of the Income TaxIncome Tax is a direct levy imposed by governments on the income generated by individuals, corporations, and other entities within a specific jurisdiction. It serves as a major source of revenue for governments and funds various public expenditures, such as infrastructure projects, healthcare, education, national security, and welfare programs. The tax is generally calculated as a percentage of the taxable... More Rules, 1962.
The High Court clarified that transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More for Non-US Transactions must be determined under domestic tax lawTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More and OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines, not by extrapolating MAP outcomes.

These contentions highlighted the legal limitations of MAP and reinforced the requirement for independent TP assessments.

Was This Decision Expected or Controversial?

The High Court’s decision was expected, given the clear legal principles governing MAP settlements and transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More assessments. However, the case remains significant in the field of international tax lawTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More, as it directly challenges Revenue’s attempt to unilaterally extend MAP outcomes to unrelated transactions.

Why Was This Decision Expected?

MAP Settlements Are Not Universally Applicable
- The MAP is a consensual dispute resolution mechanism between the competent authorities of contracting states.
- The High Court correctly ruled that MAP settlements cannot be extended unilaterally to transactions with non-US entities, as no corresponding agreements existed with those jurisdictions.
Legal Precedent Supports Independent TP Assessments
- Indian courts have consistently held that transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More must be determined independently based on OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines and domestic tax lawTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More.
- The High Court’s ruling reinforced this principle, preventing tax authorities from imposing MAP-based TP adjustments outside the negotiated framework.

Why Was This Decision Significant?

Potential Policy Shift for Revenue Authorities
- The Revenue’s attempt to apply MAP principles broadly could have had major implications for multinationals, especially those with complex international transactions involving multiple jurisdictions.
- The ruling prevents revenue authorities from using MAP as a tool to override domestic TP assessment mechanisms.
Implications for Future MAP Cases
- This decision clarifies the limitations of MAP agreements, preventing arbitrary extensions beyond their jurisdictional scope.
- Multinational enterprisesWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More (MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More) can now challenge any unilateral attempts to apply MAP-based adjustments to unrelated transactions.

While not controversial from a legal standpoint, the decision sends a strong message to tax authorities that MAP settlements cannot be used as a blanket mechanism for all TP disputes.

Significance for Multinationals

The High Court’s ruling in favour of AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. has significant implications for multinational enterprisesWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More, particularly those engaged in cross-border transactionsIntra-Group Transactions are interactions between entities within the same multinational enterprise (MNE). Such transactions form the backbone of related-party dealings and are essential in managing global operations and aligning business objectives across jurisdictions. Understanding intra-group transactions is critical in international tax and transfer pricing, as they directly impact a company's tax obligations, profitability, and compliance standing. Tax professionals, accountants, lawyers,... More and transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More disputes. The judgment reinforces key principles that protect MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More from arbitrary TP adjustments and improper application of MAP settlements.

1. Protection Against Unilateral TP Adjustments

The ruling ensures that MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More are not subject to transfer pricing adjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More based on MAP settlements that they did not negotiate or agree to.
It prevents tax authorities from applying MAP principles to unrelated transactions, giving MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More more certainty in managing TP disputes.

2. Reinforcement of Independent TP Assessments

The judgment clarifies that TP adjustments must be determined based on domestic tax lawsTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More and OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines, rather than MAP settlements from unrelated jurisdictions.
This means MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More can challenge any TP adjustments that do not align with their independent economic and functional analysisFunctional analysis is the cornerstone of transfer pricing and international tax compliance, ensuring that intercompany transactions adhere to the arm’s length principle. It evaluates the roles, contributions, and risk profiles of entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) to determine how profits and costs should be allocated. This process ensures that related-party transactions reflect the pricing that independent enterprises would establish... More.

3. Strengthened Legal Position in Future TP Disputes

The case provides a strong legal precedent for MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More facing similar disputes, reinforcing their right to demand jurisdiction-specific TP assessments.
It reduces the risk of revenue authorities imposing MAP-based adjustments to transactions that were not part of the original MAP negotiation.

4. More Strategic MAP Engagement

MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More will now approach MAP negotiations more strategically, ensuring that they clearly define the scope of their agreements and prevent their extension to unrelated transactions.

This ruling strengthens the position of MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More in global transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More matters, ensuring that their TP policies and MAP agreements remain jurisdiction-specific and legally sound.

Significance for Revenue Services

The High Court’s ruling in AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT has critical implications for tax authorities and revenue services, particularly regarding the scope and application of MAP settlements in transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More disputes.

1. Limits on the Use of MAP for Transfer Pricing AdjustmentsTransfer Pricing Adjustments are modifications made to the pricing of transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE) by tax authorities or the MNE itself. These adjustments are carried out to ensure compliance with the arm’s length principle, which stipulates that prices for intercompany transactions should reflect what independent parties would have agreed upon under similar circumstances. The arm’s... More

The ruling clarifies that MAP settlements cannot be used as a universal standard for TP adjustments, particularly when transactions fall outside the agreed framework of the MAP negotiation.
Revenue services must now ensure that each TP adjustment is independently assessed under domestic tax lawsTax laws form the backbone of any nation’s revenue system, setting the rules that govern how individuals and corporations contribute financially to support government functions. These laws define the types of taxes, the applicable rates, and the regulations regarding payment and compliance. They also outline the rights and obligations of taxpayers, ensuring a balanced and fair approach to funding public... More, rather than extending MAP-based principles to unrelated jurisdictions.

2. Necessity for More Detailed Transfer PricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More Examinations

Tax authorities must conduct thorough economic and functional analyses for TP adjustments, rather than applying a MAP-based approach without justification.
This decision emphasizes that proper comparability analysisA Comparability Analysis is an essential framework in Transfer Pricing used to evaluate whether the conditions of a transaction between related entities (such as subsidiaries of the same multinational enterprise) are consistent with the arm’s length principle. The arm’s length principle requires that intercompany transactions reflect terms that independent entities would negotiate under comparable circumstances, ensuring that multinational corporations (MNEs)... More, selection of tested parties, and application of the arm’s length principleThe Arm’s Length Principle (ALP) is a cornerstone concept in international taxation and transfer pricing. It requires that transactions between related parties, such as subsidiaries or affiliates within a multinational enterprise (MNE), mirror those that would occur between independent entities under similar circumstances. This principle ensures that each entity within an MNE is compensated fairly and transparently, based on the... More must align with OECDThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation comprising 38 member countries, established to foster economic growth, trade, and development on a global scale. Founded in 1961, the OECD provides a forum for governments to collaborate, share policy experiences, and develop solutions to common economic challenges. The OECD's core mission is to promote policies that improve... More guidelines and domestic legislation.

3. Impact on Future MAP Negotiations

The ruling prevents tax authorities from using MAP as a broad enforcement tool and reinforces its intended purpose as a dispute resolution mechanism between two contracting states.
Revenue services will need to define the scope of MAP settlements more precisely and ensure that taxpayers clearly understand the limitations of such agreements.

4. Strengthening of Taxpayer Rights

The judgment affirms that MNEsWhat are Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)? Multinational Enterprises, commonly referred to as MNEs, are corporations that operate in multiple countries through various subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates. These entities maintain a central management structure while leveraging diverse resources, labour markets, and customer bases across borders. The fundamental aspect that distinguishes MNEs from other corporate forms is their cross-border activity, which can include... More have the right to contest TP adjustments that do not conform to statutory provisions.
Revenue services must now approach TP disputes with greater procedural integrityProcedural Integrity refers to the adherence to established rules, protocols, and ethical standards in decision-making processes. It ensures that procedures are conducted transparently, fairly, and without bias, maintaining the credibility of outcomes. This principle applies across legal, tax, and administrative frameworks, where the legitimacy of decisions often relies on compliance with procedural norms. In international tax and transfer pricing contexts,... More, ensuring that adjustments are based on legally valid methodologies rather than MAP extensions.

This ruling sets a precedent for future transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More cases, reinforcing that MAP settlements must remain within their negotiated boundaries and cannot override independent TP assessments.

Similar Cases for Review

COCA COLA INDIA vs INDIA

In this case, Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd. challenged the TPO’s rejection of its comparability analysisA Comparability Analysis is an essential framework in Transfer Pricing used to evaluate whether the conditions of a transaction between related entities (such as subsidiaries of the same multinational enterprise) are consistent with the arm’s length principle. The arm’s length principle requires that intercompany transactions reflect terms that independent entities would negotiate under comparable circumstances, ensuring that multinational corporations (MNEs)... More, which resulted in an inflated transfer pricingTransfer pricing is a fundamental concept in international taxation that defines the pricing methods and rules applied to transactions between related entities within a multinational enterprise (MNE). In the context of tax regulations, it governs how prices for goods, services, or intangibles (such as intellectual property) are set when these items are exchanged between different branches, subsidiaries, or affiliates of... More (TP) adjustment. The Delhi High Court ruled that TP assessments must be conducted independently and that tax authorities cannot arbitrarily select high-profit comparables to justify an upward adjustment. This case aligns with AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT, as both reinforce the principle that TP adjustments should be based on objective economic analysis rather than external benchmarks, such as MAP settlements or forced comparability adjustments.

3M INDIA vs INDIA

3M India Ltd. entered into a MAP settlement for transactions involving US-based Associated Enterprises (AEs), but the Revenue attempted to apply the MAP framework to non-US transactions as well. The Karnataka High Court ruled that MAP resolutions cannot be extended unilaterally beyond their agreed jurisdiction. This mirrors AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT, where the Delhi High Court prevented the application of a MAP-based framework to transactions that were not covered under the agreement.

MARUTI SUZUKI vs INDIA

In this case, the Revenue imposed a TP adjustment on Maruti Suzuki India for alleged “marketing intangibles” created for its foreign parent company. The Supreme Court of India ruled that TP adjustments must reflect economic substanceEconomic substance is a foundational principle in taxation and business law, ensuring that transactions and corporate structures reflect genuine economic reality beyond their legal form. The concept aims to prevent tax avoidance by evaluating whether a transaction or arrangement has a real business purpose and economic effect other than merely achieving a tax benefit. It ensures that taxpayers cannot exploit... More rather than assumptions or arbitrary calculations. Similarly, in AON Consulting Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT, the High Court ruled that TP adjustments for Non-US Transactions must be independently assessed rather than being imposed through an unrelated MAP framework.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE SUMMARY OF THIS CASE