Portugal vs A Mining SA: JUDGMENT
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Portugal vs A Mining SA
Portugal vs A Mining SA: JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Portugal vs A Mining SA
Portugal vs A Mining SA: JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Australia vs PEPSICO
Australia vs PEPSICO: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
This case, decided by the Federal Court of Australia on 30 November 2023, addressed key taxation issues involving royalty withholding tax and diverted profits tax in the context of multinational enterprises (MNEs).
Australia vs PEPSICO: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment of: 3M Company v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
3M Company v Commissioner of Internal Revenue: JUDGMENT Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment of: Fiat Finance vs Luxembourg
Fiat Finance vs Luxembourg: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
The case involves two appeals by Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe (formerly Fiat Finance and Trade Ltd) and Ireland, challenging the General Court’s decision to uphold a European Commission ruling that a tax ruling granted by Luxembourg to Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe constituted unlawful state aid. The Commission had determined that the tax ruling issued by Luxembourg gave Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe a selective tax advantage, breaching EU state aid rules under Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Fiat Finance vs Luxembourg: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: Engie/ Luxembourg vs European Union
Engie/ Luxembourg vs European Union: JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
This case involves the European Commission’s ruling that Luxembourg’s tax rulings for ENGIE constituted unlawful state aid, creating tax advantages that contravened the competitive balance required under EU law.
Engie/ Luxembourg vs European Union: CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
In Lexel AB v Skatteverket (Case C‑484/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Swedish tax legislation, which denied Lexel AB the right to deduct interest payments made to a group company located in another EU Member State (France), infringed upon the freedom of establishment protected under Article 49 TFEU. The judgment is crucial for multinational enterprises (MNEs) operating across borders within the EU as it clarifies that differences in tax treatment of intra-group cross-border transactions are impermissible unless clearly justified by public interest reasons such as anti-avoidance.
Lexel AB v Sweden (Skatteverket): CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment of: Lexel vs AB vs Sweden
Lexel AB v Sweden (Skatteverket): JUDGMENT Read Post »
CASE SUMMARY:
This case examines the boundaries of judicial review in tax disputes involving the Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), a tax introduced by the Finance Act 2015 to prevent profit shifting by multinationals. Glencore Energy UK Limited (GENUK), a subsidiary of the Swiss-based Glencore International AG (GIAG), was assessed under the DPT framework after HMRC deemed the service fees paid by GENUK to GIAG under a Risk and Services Agreement (RSA) to be excessive.
UK vs Glencore Energy CASE SUMMARY Read Post »
DOWNLOAD the full judgment: UK vs Glencore Energy
UK vs Glencore Energy: JUDGMENT Read Post »