How audits, evidence and litigation shape arm's length outcome

A practitioner's guide to surviving a transfer pricing audit and winning at trial, from a lawyer who has argued TP disputes across African courts.
Includes a FREE copy of Tax Intelligence: The 7 Habitual Tax Mistakes Made by Companies (2nd Ed).
100% money-back guarantee — if you don't like what you read, you'll get your money back.
Transfer pricing disputes are won or lost long before court. Drawing on decades of preparing for and arguing transfer pricing trials, including the landmark ABD Ltd v CSARS case in South Africa, Dr Daniel N Erasmus takes you chronologically through the entire dispute lifecycle: from the transfer pricing study and contemporaneous documentation, through the initial tax audit and letter of findings, to giving evidence, expert reports, the trial itself, and the decision whether to appeal.
The book's central argument is that a transfer pricing study, local file or master file is only the starting point. What decides a trial is evidence: documentation that satisfies the rules of evidence, hearsay and its exceptions, business records, the parol evidence rule, and expert testimony that survives cross-examination. Erasmus breaks these rules down for TP specialists who were never schooled in the law of evidence, with practical strategies for managing audits, challenging a revenue authority's procedures, and building a defensible position from day one.
Enriched by experience in courts across South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, Nigeria, Ghana and Uganda, the principles draw on English common law and carry practical global applicability. Extensive appendices supply the raw material: post-trial interviews with the two senior advocates from the ABD case, real cross-examination transcripts of expert witnesses, tax risk management and tax steering committee templates, audit engagement guidance, and a specimen advance pricing agreement.
The closing case studies distil hard lessons from some of the most difficult TP trials the author has fought: the burden of proof rests on the taxpayer, substance prevails over form, and inconsistent documentation destroys credibility. Published by the Academy of Tax Law as part of The Tax Intelligence Series, edited by transfer pricing and Pillar 2 advisor Palesa Sansole.
“Many rights that exist in favour of an MNE are lost if not used in time.”Dr Daniel N Erasmus