Academy of taxlaw.
Register your interest

Tell us where you’re headed

We’ll confirm by email and a programme advisor will be in touch. We’ll also add you to the Academy newsletter (sent via Mailchimp) — every email includes a one-click unsubscribe.

Country guide · Transfer pricing & international tax

Transfer Pricing in Togo

A practitioner's guide to transfer pricing in Togo: the arm's length rule in articles 104 to 106 ter of the Code Général des Impôts, the XOF 500 million and XOF 1 billion filing thresholds, and how the Office Togolais des Recettes enforces them.

Last verified 8 August 2026 Download the PDF All country guides →
The essentials

Togo at a glance

Framework

Tax authority Office Togolais des Recettes (OTR) — Commissariat des Impôts

Large taxpayers sit with the Direction des Grandes Entreprises (DGE), and their audits are run inside it by the Division de la Vérification des Impôts; the Direction du Contrôle Fiscal is one of the two directions de conception (divisions DERPI and DSERF) rather than the operational auditor. Rulings and disputes sit with the Direction de la Législation Fiscale et du Contentieux (DLFC), whose divisions are the DLF and the DC. No dedicated transfer pricing or international tax unit appears anywhere in the published organisation chart.

OTR, Directions et Attributions (CI); Commissariat des Impôts organigramme
Primary legislation CGI arts. 104–106 ter; penalties at LPF art. 113

The whole section was written by Loi n°2022-022 of 27 December 2022 (Finance Law 2023). The operative text is OTR's consolidated CGI/LPF, 361 pages, republished 18 September 2025.

CGI arts. 104–106 ter and footnotes citing Loi n°2022-022
Arm's length standard CGI art. 104 — transaction-based, and it applies to purely domestic related-party dealings as well as cross-border ones

Conditions must not differ from those independent enterprises would agree for comparable transactions in comparable circumstances. Groups that assume Togolese-to-Togolese charges fall outside the rules are wrong.

CGI art. 104, opening paragraph
Related-party and control test Majority of capital or voting rights, directly or through an intermediary, or de facto decision-making power (art. 104(3)); no threshold below majority

Article 104(2) removes the control requirement altogether where the counterparty is in a privileged tax regime within art. 99.s, and art. 99.s separately reverses the burden of proof on deductions to such payees.

CGI arts. 104(2)–(3) and 99.s
Status of the OECD Guidelines No status in Togolese law, and no OECD transfer pricing country profile exists for Togo

Full-text search of the 2025 consolidated code returns no reference to the OECD or the Guidelines. Togo appears in none of the OECD profile batches (83 jurisdictions to October 2025), so the series cannot be used as a source here.

CGI/LPF 2025 consolidated text; OECD TP country profile series

Methods & Comparability

Prescribed methods None — the statute names no method, no hierarchy and no comparability factors

Nothing in articles 104 to 106 ter addresses intangibles, intra-group services or cost contribution arrangements either.

CGI arts. 104–106 ter
Methods recognised in practice Six options on the OTR return: CUP, resale price, cost plus, TNMM, profit split, other methods

Effectively the OECD taxonomy adopted at form level rather than in legislation; where 'other' is ticked, the method must be described in free text.

OTR form ref. OTR/Pro-Pf/ErG/005, part III
Comparables and ranges No rule at all — no interquartile range, no tested-party convention, no multi-year data rule, no local-comparable requirement

The form drives practice toward a single point: one method and one margin per transaction category, and where several counterparties transact at different margins only the largest transaction's margin is reported.

CGI/LPF 2025 full-text search; OTR explanatory notice, items (9)–(19)
Royalty deduction ceiling 5% of turnover excluding tax

Deductible only if the payer proves the expenditure corresponds to real transactions and is not excessive — a de facto cap that overrides any benchmarking study.

CGI art. 99.k
Technical assistance and head office costs 25% of taxable profit before deducting those fees

Article 99.l defines technical assistance to include accounting, tax, IT, administrative, legal, financial and HR services between art. 104 related enterprises. In a loss year the limit is tested against the most recent unbarred profitable year; if none is profitable the deduction is lost permanently.

CGI art. 99.l
Related-party interest limits Legal rate + 3 points on partner advances; legal rate for non-bank foreign lenders; overall cap of 30% of EBITDA

Share capital must be fully paid up. Excess partner interest disallowed under art. 99.m is treated as distributed income under art. 43, even where there is no taxable profit.

CGI art. 99.m; CGI art. 43(3)

Documentation & Disclosure

Simplified TP return — threshold XOF 500,000,000 turnover excluding tax or gross balance-sheet assets

Also caught: an enterprise holding directly or indirectly more than half the capital or votes of an entity above that level, or more than half held by such an entity.

CGI art. 105(1)–(2)
Simplified TP return — deadline 30 April; 31 May for insurance and reinsurance companies

Fixed by cross-reference to LPF art. 49, i.e. the corporate income tax return deadline. An extension must be requested in writing from the Commissaire des impôts at least 15 days beforehand (CGI art. 126).

CGI art. 105(1); LPF art. 49; CGI art. 126
Return form, content and granularity OTR model form OTR/Pro-Pf/ErG/005, five parts, filed in paper and electronic form with the CIT return; XOF 50,000,000 reporting floor

Parts cover general information, the group and its intangibles, a transaction summary by nature, amount, country, method and margin, intra-group loans, and the declarant's own activity including restructurings. Categories are reported as single aggregates above XOF 50m and loans listed individually only above that balance. Content is formally left to an arrêté under art. 105(3) that has never been published.

CGI art. 105(3); OTR explanatory notice, items (7), (15), (17)–(19)
Documentation threshold XOF 1,000,000,000 turnover excluding tax or gross assets

Cut twentyfold by the 2023 Finance Law from the old XOF 20 billion test. Any secondary source still quoting XOF 20 billion is describing repealed law.

CGI art. 106(1)–(2); former art. 106-I in the OTR 2022 Finance Law extract
When the file must exist At the date the tax audit is commenced; 15 days to cure after a mise en demeure

A genuinely contemporaneous obligation — the file must already exist when the auditor arrives, and there is no annual filing of the documentation itself. The formal notice must specify which documents or supplements are expected.

CGI art. 106(1) and (5)
File structure and language Group-level plus entity-level information (art. 106(3)); French throughout (LPF art. 4)

A master file/local file architecture in substance, but content and format are delegated to an unpublished arrêté, so no official specification exists. The file does not replace transaction-level evidence (art. 106(4)), and it must be furnished within 30 days on cessation or transfer of the business (CGI art. 125(2)). The administration may order translation at the taxpayer's cost.

CGI arts. 106(3)–(4), 125(2); LPF art. 4
Country-by-country report XOF 492,000,000,000 consolidated turnover; filed electronically within 12 months of year end

Secondary and local filing under art. 106 bis(2)–(3), a designated Togolese filer permitted under (5), and a surrogate-filing exemption conditional on a notification for which no deadline or form is prescribed. The report format and the list of exchange partners are left to arrêtés that have not been published, and no CbC form appears in the OTR forms library.

CGI art. 106 bis(1)–(8); OTR forms library
Requests to below-threshold taxpayers 30 days to reply, then a further 15 days after formal notice

Article 106 ter lets the administration demand relationship details, the pricing method and its justification, the related parties' activities and their tax treatment, once it holds evidence suggesting an indirect transfer of profits. Requests must be precise as to jurisdiction, entity and amounts.

CGI art. 106 ter

Penalties & Enforcement

Fixed compliance fines XOF 10,000,000 simplified return; XOF 50,000,000 CbC report; XOF 5,000,000 per year for an unanswered art. 106 ter request

Each applies equally to non-filing and to an incomplete or inaccurate filing, and none scales with transaction size.

LPF art. 113(3)
Documentation penalty 0.5% of the transactions not documented, minimum XOF 10,000,000, for each audited year

Triggered by failure to respond, or an incomplete response, to the art. 106(5) formal notice. On a three-year audit the floor alone is XOF 30 million before any adjustment.

LPF art. 113(3), second paragraph
Adjustment penalties 20% understatement; 40% bad faith; 80% fraudulent manoeuvres; 30–80% on ex officio assessment; late payment 10% plus 1% per month

Where an adjustment only reduces or cancels a loss the uplift is 5% of the adjustment; mixed cases split 5% on the loss-absorbing portion and 20% on recovered tax.

LPF arts. 115, 117, 118 and 121
Penalty protection None for documentation; only the mention expresse relief in LPF art. 117

Reasons set out expressly on the return or an annexed note remove the 20% uplift on those grounds. The administration bears the burden of proving bad faith or fraud when penalties are litigated (art. 119).

LPF arts. 117 and 119
Limitation and audit duration Reassessment to the end of the third year following the year of the tax; on-site audits capped at 3, 6 or 9 months

Nine months applies to taxpayers managed by the large business directorate, on pain of nullity of the assessments. The clock is extended while foreign authorities respond to information requests — directly relevant to exchange-driven TP audits. No extended cross-border limitation period exists.

LPF arts. 316, 317 and 233
Secondary adjustments No repatriation regime, but adjustments are deemed distributed income and bear 13% withholding

Article 43(3) treats audit adjustments not left invested in the business as distributions. Where an adjustment merely cancels a loss, the administration must prove the partners appropriated the reinstated sums.

CGI arts. 43(3) and 79

Dispute Resolution & Certainty

Advance pricing agreements None — no APA programme of any type, and no transfer pricing safe harbour

Full-text search of the 2025 consolidated code finds no accord préalable provision, hence no thresholds, fee, term or rollback.

CGI/LPF 2025 consolidated text
Advance rulings Statutory rescrit fiscal since FY2026 at LPF art. 4 bis — but no transfer pricing rescrit published, and still no APA

Loi n°2025-002 (Finance Law 2026) formally frames the procedure: the request must be made before the filing deadline or before the tax falls due; the administration has three months to rule, and the text does not state the consequence of silence; the guarantee ceases only prospectively, from the date the taxpayer is informed, where the facts change, the legislation changes or the administration revises its assessment. The anonymised set published 3 February 2025 contains only R1 (withholding on sums paid to non-residents) and R2 (extension of diplomatic exemptions).

Loi n°2025-002 inserting LPF art. 4 bis, as reported in CMS, Lois de finances 2026 en Afrique de l'Ouest et centrale; OTR, Rescrits fiscaux (3 February 2025)
Administrative review Commission Administrative des Recours — reasoned opinion on questions of fact within 2 months

Either party may refer. The opinion binds neither side, but art. 363 places the burden of proof on whichever party rejects it — a decisive tactical point. Collection notices issue 30 days after the final notification of adjustments.

LPF arts. 234, 236, 237, 238 and 363
Courts Courts of Appeal sitting as administrative chambers, first and last instance; action within 2 months of the decision or 6 months of the claim

A contentious claim goes first to the Commissaire des impôts and must meet the art. 376 admissibility conditions, in French, with the collection notice and adjustment notifications attached. Onward recourse is cassation to the Cour Suprême. No Togolese TP judgment has been reported.

LPF arts. 376, 380 and 381
MAP and corresponding adjustments Treaty only — UEMOA art. 38 gives a 3-year MAP window and art. 10(2) a corresponding adjustment; the France 1971 treaty has no corresponding-adjustment paragraph

OTR publishes only the 1971 France–Togo convention, the UEMOA convention (Règlement n°08/2008/CM/UEMOA) and the ECOWAS Additional Act. Investors from outside francophone West Africa generally have no treaty route to relieve a Togolese adjustment.

Règlement n°08/2008/CM/UEMOA arts. 10, 33, 38; France–Togo convention arts. 11 and 41

Current Developments

2026 Finance Law Loi n°2025-002, adopted 29 December 2025 — arts. 104–106 ter unchanged, but the construction PE threshold falls from 6 months to 3 (CGI art. 95.2) and a statutory rescrit arrives (LPF art. 4 bis)

The shorter PE threshold is a BEPS Action 7-type measure and bears directly on transfer pricing: a three-month site or installation project now creates a Togolese taxable presence whose profits must be priced. No CbCR or Pillar Two measure. Other reported measures are certified e-invoicing, a 5% levy on gambling winnings above XOF 500,000, agricultural VAT relief, an export levy on cashew, soya and shea, a disability hiring credit and a 3.5% levy on reassessed property values.

Loi n°2025-002 as reported in CMS, Lois de finances 2026 en Afrique de l'Ouest et centrale; L'Economiste du Togo, décryptage of the 2026 finance law; Togo First, 7 January 2026
Pillar Two Not enacted — no GloBE, IIR, UTPR or QDMTT anywhere in the code; CIT 27%, minimum charge 1% of turnover

Togo joined the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on 1 September 2021 as its 140th member and remains on the membership list updated 5 December 2025, but has legislated none of the two-pillar solution: zero occurrences of GloBE, IIR, UTPR, QDMTT, pilier or impôt complémentaire in the consolidated code. The 27% rate sits at CGI art. 113; the art. 120 minimum forfaitaire (1% of turnover, 2% on used vehicle imports for resale, XOF 20,000 floor) is unrelated to the GloBE rules.

CGI arts. 113 and 120; CGI/LPF 2025 full-text search; OECD Inclusive Framework membership list (5 December 2025)
Amount B Listed covered jurisdiction, but no position taken — no election, no guidance, no reference in law

Togo is named on the Inclusive Framework's published list of covered jurisdictions annexed to the 2024 Statement, which activates other members' political commitment to respect Amount B outcomes where Togo applies the simplified and streamlined approach and to relieve the resulting double taxation under a treaty in force. Nothing in the CGI, LPF or any published OTR circular takes that up, and full-text search returns no occurrence of montant B.

OECD, Statement on the definition of covered jurisdiction for the Amount B political commitment; CGI/LPF 2025 consolidated text; OTR circulaires library
Implementation gaps Four delegating arrêtés remain unpublished (arts. 105(3), 106(3), 106 bis(6) and 106 bis(8))

OTR's explanatory notice and form still cite pre-2023 numbering and state that all related enterprises must file regardless of turnover — the repealed rule, conflicting with the XOF 500m test in art. 105(2). OECD Action 13 peer reviews report missing definitions of Group, MNE Group and Constituent Entity and no CbC exchange relationships in place.

CGI art. 105(2) vs OTR explanatory notice; OECD CbCR peer review compilations

The legal framework

Articles 104 to 106 ter of the Code Général des Impôts, with the penalty provisions at article 113 of the Livre des Procédures Fiscales, were enacted in their present form by Loi n°2022-022 of 27 December 2022, the Finance Law for 2023. The operative text is the Office Togolais des Recettes' consolidated CGI/LPF, republished on 18 September 2025.

Article 104 states a free-standing arm's length principle: an enterprise transacting with an associated enterprise, in Togo or abroad, must compute taxable profit as independent enterprises would have agreed for comparable transactions in comparable circumstances. The wording is transaction-based, and it reaches purely domestic related-party dealings. Article 104(1) then carries the francophone transfert indirect de bénéfices power: profits shifted by inflated or deflated prices, or by any other means, are added back by comparison with what would have been earned absent the dependence relationship. Control is defined at article 104(3) as majority capital or voting rights, held directly or through an intermediary, or de facto decision-making power, in either direction or through a common parent. Article 104(2) dispenses with the control test entirely where the counterparty sits in a privileged tax regime within article 99.s.

The statute names no methods, sets no hierarchy, identifies no comparability factors, and is silent on intangibles, services and cost contribution arrangements. The OECD Guidelines have no status in Togolese law, and no OECD country profile exists for Togo.

Methods, comparables and benchmarking

Because the statute prescribes nothing, the method taxonomy enters Togolese practice through a form. The OTR's simplified declaration (ref. OTR/Pro-Pf/ErG/005) requires a tick, for each category of related-party transaction, in one of six columns: comparable uncontrolled price, resale price, cost plus, transactional net margin, profit split, or other methods described in free text.

Benchmarking mechanics are absent. The form pushes toward a single point: one method and one margin per category, and where several counterparties transact at different margins, only the margin on the largest transaction is reported. A tick-box records any change of method, rate or margin during the year or against the prior year. In Togo the practical audit trigger is an unexplained movement in margin, not a result outside a range.

Fixed statutory ceilings do much of the work benchmarking does elsewhere. Royalties are deductible only to 5% of turnover excluding tax, and only where the payer proves a real and non-excessive transaction (article 99.k). Technical assistance fees and head office cost shares are capped at 25% of taxable profit before their deduction (article 99.l). Related-party interest is limited to the legal rate plus three points on partner advances, to the legal rate for non-bank foreign lenders, and overall to 30% of EBITDA (article 99.m).

Documentation: what the OTR expects

Two obligations sit at different thresholds. Article 105 requires an annual simplified transfer pricing declaration from controlled or controlling Togolese enterprises where turnover excluding tax or gross balance-sheet assets exceed XOF 500,000,000, or where the enterprise holds, or is held as to, more than half the capital or votes of an enterprise above that level. Article 106 requires a complete documentation file at XOF 1,000,000,000 on the same tests. That documentation threshold was cut twentyfold by the 2023 Finance Law: the pre-2023 figure was XOF 20 billion, and any source still quoting it is describing repealed law.

The declaration is due with the corporate income tax return under article 49 LPF — 30 April, or 31 May for insurers — and OTR's notice requires paper and electronic filing simultaneously. Its five parts cover general information, the group and its intangibles, a summary of related-party transactions by nature, amount, country, method and margin, intra-group loans, and the declarant's own activity including restructurings. A XOF 50,000,000 floor governs granularity: categories are aggregated above that figure and loan balances listed individually only above it.

The article 106 file is never filed annually. It must exist, in paper or electronic form, at the date the audit commences. If it is missing or incomplete, article 106(5) requires a mise en demeure giving 15 days to produce or complete. Article 106(3) describes a two-tier structure, group information plus entity information, but leaves content and format to a ministerial arrêté that has never been published, so there is no official master file or local file specification. The same is true of the CbC report format and the exchange-partner list. French governs throughout under article 4 LPF, which lets the administration order translation at the taxpayer's cost.

Country-by-country reporting bites at consolidated turnover of XOF 492,000,000,000, filed electronically within 12 months of year end (article 106 bis), with secondary and designated local filing and a surrogate-filing notification that carries no stated deadline or form.

Audits, penalties and the enforcement climate

Enforcement is built around the audit, not annual review. On-site examination is capped, on pain of nullity, at three, six or nine months depending on regime, the nine-month ceiling applying to taxpayers handled by the Direction des Grandes Entreprises, and extended while foreign authorities respond to information requests. Reassessment runs to the end of the third year following the year the tax was due (article 316 LPF); there is no extended cross-border period. Article 106 ter lets the administration reach below-threshold taxpayers once it holds evidence suggesting profit shifting, with 30 days to answer a precise request and a further 15 after a formal notice.

The compliance fines are flat and heavy for a market this size: XOF 10,000,000 for a late, incomplete or inaccurate simplified declaration; XOF 50,000,000 for a CbC failure; XOF 5,000,000 per year covered by an unanswered article 106 ter request. Documentation is priced differently — 0.5% of the transactions covered by documents not produced after the mise en demeure, subject to a XOF 10,000,000 floor, for each audited year. On a three-year audit the floor alone is XOF 30 million before any adjustment.

Adjustments then attract the ordinary uplifts: 20% for understated bases, 40% for bad faith, 80% for fraudulent manoeuvres, with 30% to 80% on ex officio assessment and late-payment interest of 10% plus 1% a month. There is no documentation-based penalty protection; the only shelter is the mention expresse in article 117 LPF, where reasons stated on the return remove the 20% uplift on those grounds. And although Togo has no repatriation regime, article 43(3) treats audit adjustments not left invested in the business as distributed income, taxed at 13% withholding.

Dispute resolution and advance certainty

There is no advance pricing agreement programme in Togo and no transfer pricing safe harbour. Advance certainty did improve in one respect for FY2026: the 2026 Finance Law inserted article 4 bis LPF, which frames the rescrit fiscal in statute for the first time. The request must be made before the filing deadline or before the tax falls due; the administration has three months to rule, though the text does not say what silence means; and the guarantee ceases only prospectively, from the date the taxpayer is informed, where the facts change, the legislation changes or the administration revises its assessment. What the regime has not yet produced is a transfer pricing rescrit — the anonymised set published on 3 February 2025 covers withholding on sums paid to non-residents and the extension of diplomatic exemptions.

Domestically, adjustments follow the adversarial procedure at articles 234 and 236 LPF, and either party may refer the disagreement to the Commission Administrative des Recours, which rules on fact and must give a reasoned opinion within two months. The opinion binds neither side, but article 363 places the burden of proof on whichever party rejects it. Collection notices issue 30 days after the final notification. A contentious claim then goes to the Commissaire des impôts, subject to the admissibility conditions in article 376, and from there to the Courts of Appeal sitting as administrative chambers in first and last instance, within two months of the decision or six months of the claim if none is given, with cassation to the Cour Suprême.

Treaty relief is thin. OTR publishes only the 1971 France–Togo convention, the UEMOA convention (Règlement n°08/2008/CM/UEMOA) and the ECOWAS Additional Act. UEMOA article 10(2) obliges a corresponding adjustment and article 38 gives a three-year MAP window; the France treaty has a primary adjustment article with no corresponding-adjustment paragraph. Investors from outside francophone West Africa generally have no treaty route to relieve a Togolese adjustment at all.

Pillar Two and what changes in 2026

Togo joined the Inclusive Framework on 1 September 2021 as its 140th member, but has enacted nothing of Pillar Two. The domestic rate is 27% (article 113), with a turnover-based minimum charge of 1%, or 2% on used vehicle imports for resale, under article 120; that minimum has nothing to do with the GloBE rules. Togo has likewise taken no position on Amount B — no election, no guidance, no reference to the simplified and streamlined approach anywhere in the code or in OTR circulars — even though it is named on the Inclusive Framework's published list of covered jurisdictions.

The 2026 Finance Law (Loi n°2025-002), adopted on 29 December 2025 within a XOF 2,740.5 billion budget, leaves articles 104 to 106 ter untouched and adds no CbCR or Pillar Two measure — but it is not neutral for international tax. It cuts the permanent establishment threshold for construction sites and installation projects from six months to three (article 95.2 CGI), so shorter projects now create a Togolese taxable presence whose profits have to be priced, and it inserts the statutory rescrit at article 4 bis LPF. The other reported measures are certified electronic invoicing, a 5% levy on gambling winnings above XOF 500,000, agricultural VAT relief, an export levy on cashew, soya and shea, a disability hiring credit and a 3.5% levy on reassessed property value increases.

How practitioners should respond

Three practical points follow. First, the thresholds are low by regional standards and catch mid-sized subsidiaries: a Togolese company with XOF 1 billion of assets needs a file that exists on day one of an audit, not one commissioned when the auditor arrives. Second, because the code specifies no file content, the defensible course is to prepare an OECD-shaped master file and local file in French and be ready to explain the mapping; nothing in Togolese law forbids it, and no alternative specification exists. Third, the fixed ceilings at articles 99.k, 99.l and 99.m will disallow charges that a benchmarking study comfortably supports, so model them before pricing royalties, service fees or intra-group debt.

Two live traps deserve flagging to clients. OTR's explanatory notice and declaration form still cite pre-2023 numbering and state that all related enterprises must file the simplified return regardless of turnover — the repealed rule. Article 105(2) sets a XOF 500 million test and should prevail, but OTR has not withdrawn the guidance, and where the position is marginal the safe course is to file. And no Togolese transfer pricing case law has yet been reported, which is unsurprising: with a three-year reassessment window, the first audits under the 2023 regime are only now reaching the administrative chambers.

Take it with you

Download the Togo guide as a PDF

The full guide — facts panel, commentary and sources — formatted for sharing with your team. We’ll email you a personal download link.

We’ll also keep you posted when this guide is updated. No spam — unsubscribe any time.

Go deeper

Master transfer pricing where it’s practised

Explore the TP programme Speak to the team